Steel Lard 2024 - part two the aftermath

Steel Lard 2024 ended with the Wee Derek Awards. These were presented in memory of our friend Derek Hodge, who passed away this year and who was a stalwart of the Lard community.  Thanks are due to Patriot Games who kindly matched our contribution enabling us to offer two £40 prizes in Derek's memory.

The Wee Derek Award for Game Design was voted for by the players. Second place was a damned close-run thing with Phil Crebbin's Cthulhu-themed What a Cowboy game coming in just ahead of... well... modesty forbids. The winner by a head, though, was John Savage's very pretty Up Country. 

This was the most popular choice of games in advance of the day. Lovely terrain, a skilled game-runner and a new version of the Lardies' most popular rules conspiring to make a hugely popular offering.

We them moved on to the Wee Derek Spirit of Lard Award. This was chosen by acclamation of the game-runners. It was inevitable that it would be difficult to identify a single player who had exemplified the spirit of the day as the game-runners only get to see a portion of what goes on. However, one name came up twice.

Dex reported that Simon had provided some really insightful feedback after the morning session. He incorporated Simon's suggestions and the afternoon game was much better as a result.

Then Ken was enthusiastic about the unexpected death of Robert Rogers in the second run of the La Chute game. Apparently Simon played a heroic role in this.

Not one to look a gift horse in the mouth, I announced that Simon Walker had won the award. 

There were one or two funny looks at this and it soon became apparent that the two anecdotes referred to different Simons! Fortunately the prize was in the form of two £20 vouchers so it was decided that Simon Walker and Simon Beale would leave with one voucher each! 2024 will henceforth be known in Lardy circles as The Year of the Two Simons.

After tidying away the impedimenta, I managed to get home for half an hour and drop off the car. Wife and daughter were attending a Bellowhead gig in the city so Jamie and I were able to get a lift back into town to attend the after-Lard drinks.

Triple Point Brewery proved a successful venue; close to Patriot Games with excellent beer and reasonable food. We stayed for a couple of hours before decamping to the nearby Rutland Arms for a few more. Here we ended up snuggled onto a table in the beer garden with some students. Ken got chatting with them and it turned out that they had both hometown and football club in common.

The end of the Bellowhead gig mean that our ride was waiting so Jamie and I slunk away. I believe further craic was had and I know there was a game of Midgard Heroic Battles at Patriot Games on the Sunday.

The final outstanding issue (except that I need to pay Patriot Games) was to decide on my approach to next year's Steel Lard. 

I've now organised for three years and that's more than any of my predecessors. I've found that in organising the event and putting on a new game each year, I'm tending to get in less actual wargaming over the course of the year. In addition, running the second, emergency game meant that I wasn't able to give either set of players the experience I'd have preferred.

In 2025 I want to concentrate on using the toys I already own and getting in more varied games. I'll therefore be looking for someone else to take on the burden of organising Steel Lard. 

What I will offer to do for whoever takes over, apart form providing advice, is to run a game at Steel Lard.  It would be designed from the start to be scalable in the event of a last minute cancellation. It'd probably be another Sharp Practice game and probably use the large collection of models I created for the Woebetide Islands.

So in conclusion, if you're a Sheffield-area Lardy you may get canvassed as a future organiser. And wherever you're based, I strongly recommend that you get to a Lardy Day and maybe stick around for the AfterLard.

Steel Lard 2024 Report - part one, the games

Another Steel Lard has gone by and I'm pretty satisfied with how it went. We gathered on Saturday morning at Patriot games and set up the games. John Savage was running his very pretty Vietnam War scenario Up Country using the new second edition of Chain of Command.

The second edition isn't available yet but John's been involved in the play-testing. As such, John's game was by far the most popular with punters keen to try out the new rules. The fact that John's games are always gorgeous didn't hurt.

Also in the play-test team and presenting a CoC2 game was Dex McHenry. Dex kindly stepped up to run his game Squarepegged Valentines after another game runner dropped out. The game featured Kiwi-crewed Valentine tanks in the jungle against the Japanese in 1944; well outside their designed environment and after they'd been withdrawn from service elsewhere!

Dex plays all of his games in 15mm scale, which is perfect for Chain of Command as the model scale matches the ground scale of the rules.

Another WWII game was Alex Sotheran's Crossing the Vire. This was also in 15mm scale but using the battalion-level O Group rules. Crossing the Vire was our only all-day game. The Lardy Day audience seems to prefer to get in two different games during the day but I know I've really enjoyed playing an all-day CoC game and Alex's players seem to have had a great time with this game.

Our final twentieth century game was Ian Garbutt's offering using a modified version of What a Tanker! 

Called, after a plaintive radio message from a US tank commander during the battle, It's a Shit Show, the game saw American Shermans blundering into a German defensive position including not one, not two but three King Tigers!

Jamie played in this one in the morning and really enjoyed it. Played with 10mm scale models, the game featured some innovative and successful fog-of-war mechanisms that kept the US commanders on their toes at all times.

Jamie also played in Phil Crebbin's Keep the Last Bullet for Yourself. This was a What a Cowboy variant in an H P Lovecraft-inspired setting. Sorry, only one picture of this one but it was popular with the players.

Ken Welsh provided another episode in his series of French and Indian War Sharp Practice games. War on the Run saw Rogers' Rangers clashing with French-allied native Americans along the La Chute river. Contrary to historical precedent one of the British players managed to get Robert Rogers killed in action.

Ken's games are always very pretty but unfortunately I only managed to get any pictures during the inter-game pause when there were no miniatures on the table. Still nice though!

Finally there were my two offerings. Two because we had a game runner drop out through illness in the last few hours before the day. I dusted off a planned reserve scenario using my American Civil War figures and the Sharp Practice rules. Fortunately Matt Slade and Ian Hemmingway were scheduled to play in the morning and afternoon sessions respectively and were able to take on most of the umpiring responsibility.

It wasn't the prettiest game but it did feature an interesting plot twist. The single group of "Union Cavalry" that appeared part way through eventually turned out to be a party of senior Confederate officers. In fact this was something of a disguised scenario. Although it was based on and advertised as Port Gibson, Mississippi on 1st May 1863, in fact much of the situation was derived from Chancellorsville the following day and a thousand miles to the Northeast. 

In the morning session, Matt's Union troops managed to wound one of the "cavalry",  an action that I subsequently revealed was leading to the death-from-wounds of General Thomas J "Stonewall" Jackson. 

In reality Jackson was shot by Confederate infantry and succumbed a couple of weeks later. In our second game he survived unscathed.

Finally there was my own Siege of Puebla 1863 game using the Sharp Practice rules.

I was mostly too busy to document what went on but I did get this pic of players Mark, Daniel, Terry and Stewart...

I designed the game such that a scenario that could potentially be quite static was made more mobile by means of the night fighting rules (see my previous posts) and giving the player-leaders interesting character traits and objectives. These seemed to work quite well in both run-throughs.

Another innovation in this game was that the achievements of the players in the morning session would influence the set-up in the afternoon.

The morning French players managed to detonate their mine under the walls of the penitentiary...

... and to capture half of the building and the nearby public gardens. In the afternoon game the French attackers were allowed to position deployment points in both of these blocks.

In addition, any buildings destroyed by French shelling in the morning remained in that state during the afternoon. This gave us a realistic progressive destruction of the city as fighting continued.

In the morning game I had two complete SP novices so I had to be more involved with Puebla and leave Matt Slade to run the Port Gibson game. This meant that I got a decent idea of the progress of the scenario. Despite heavy losses the Mexicans managed to hold on to all but two front line blocks.

The morning session was a great illustration of how Sharp Practice excels as a narrative game. Mark was suffficiently enthused after his first ever game that he's put Sharp Practice on his shopping list.

In the afternoon Michael, Grayde, Barry and Andrew took over. They would play the same characters with the same personal objectives and force levels (as if the morning hadn't happened) but with the damaged buildings and deployment zones based on the morning session.  The morning French players' progress allowed their afternoon successors to start with deployment points in the public gardens and one half of the penitentiary.

The afternoon game flowed better because there was a higher proportion of experienced Sharp Practice players. This led to my spending more time spread between the two games.

The French managed to capture the penitentiary after several fierce bouts of fisticuffs. 

Character development worked particularly well with Lâcharde, the Legendary Hero of France, being knocked unconscious and, who knows, maybe losing his reputation. Captain Balourd of the Turcos rose to the challenge and seems to have overcome his crisis of confidence. Meanwhile Victor Vectra of the Puebla militia managed to recover his father's Toledo-steel sword from a ruined house on the enemy siege lines.

In the end, though, the superior quality of the French soldiers told and by the time we reached a suitable stopping point the Mexicans were down to a single point of Force Morale; Vive la France!

Part two will follow shortly with a report on the Wee Derek Awards and the evening's merry making.

Sharp Practice night fighting rules

These are my finalised Sharp Practice night fighting rules. They were were designed to encourage manoeuvre in my Siege of Puebla, 1863 game. They seemed to work OK without significantly slowing things down.

At the start of a unit's activation (whether under a Leader's command before Tiffin or on a command flag after Tiffin) roll a d6 to see if it is alert:

Unit spotting	Roll to be alert
Detached Leaders, Regulars, Artillery or Light Infantry	3+
Conscripts and Volunteers or Skirmishers	4+
Militia or Irregular Skirmishers	5+

If the unit is alert give it an "alert marker". Mine look like this:

The unit retains its "alert marker" until the start of its next activation. If it fails the die roll, remove any existing "alert marker".

At the end of a unit's activation, check whether it fired. If it did, place a "unit fired" marker next to it. If it did not, remove any "unit fired" marker it may have. My "unit fired" markers look like this:

Units are spotted at the following ranges:

Unit being spotted	Spotted at
Line unit in the open	12” / 24"
Skirmish unit in the open	9” / 18"
Unit in cover	6” / 12"
Has a “unit fired” marker (in cover or not)	24" / 48"

 

The range before the slash refers to units that are not alert. The number after the slash refers to units that are alert. Thus a group of Mexican skirmishers in the cover of the public gardens will be spotted by a French unit up to 48" away if the French unit has an alert marker and the Mexicans have a "unit fired" marker. If the Mexicans haven't fired, they'll be hidden from troops more than 12" away (or more than 6" away if the spotting unit isn't alert).

I didn't use any cavalry in my game. I'd suggest that maybe they should be spotted at 18"/36" in the open.

Steel Lard tomorrow

I'll be off down to Patriot Games in the morning to run the Too Fat Lardies games day known as Steel Lard. This is the third one I've organised and the fifth or sixth altogether. It's been a stressful process getting us here!

Nighttime in Puebla - Turco skirmishers advance

In previous years we generally had a pretty good match between the number of people wanting to play and the number of spaces available. The only major problem was when Richard Phillips came down with a horrible bug the day before and I was forced to cobble together an additional game using my Woebetides Sharp Practice collection.

This time I decided to be prepared and I planned out a reserve game using my ACW collection just in case the worse happened. And sure enough last night the worst happened. This time it's Ken Reilly who is unwell. 

So I spent the morning tidying up the scenario and got together the paperwork, models and terrain for Port Gibson, 1863 - a scenario that takes place on the time night in May 1863 as my Puebla one. Reports, as best I can, on both games sometime next week.

So the stuff is in the car...

... it's been great to discover bits of scenery and the like that work for an ad hoc game if need be; benefits of years spent doing this. My Dark Age church will be seeing service as a barn!

Steel Lard is great fun and hopefully that's the last major crisis out of the way....

Been a bit busy

I'm aware that I haven't posted much here recently. I apologise to the tens of thousands who've been having on my every written word! I've been a bit busy getting the admin sorted out for Steel Lard this coming weekend as well as helping the Baroness sort out the decoration of the village hall for this Christmas's Sheffield Carols.

I should be back to normal service shortly but in the meantime here are a few pictures of a dragon I've just finished painting.

More 15mm

The recycling of 15mm figures from the bag-of-white-metal-to-be-melted-down is mostly complete for now. 

I've painted these seventeenth century guys up as an approximation of Scottish troops in Swedish service during the Thirty Years War. They're based on what I could find about Mackay's regiment.

On Dex's advice I've put them on 40mm wide bases suitable for DBR and I suspect other popular sets for the period. In addition, being in sixes and twelves, they could potentially be used for The Pikeman's Lament. The singly based trumpeter in the rear would do well as a messenger needed for one of the Lion Rampant/TPL scenarios.

I'll get round to putting them on eBay shortly.

Fiasco purchases

Jamie and I went up to Leeds at the weekend to attend the Fiasco show. We try to get up there each year and it's become a tradition to visit the nearby Pizza Express at lunchtime.

In the past I've been to Fiasco and bought nothing at all, other times I've splurged heavily. This time I was relatively restrained. I bought some Dark Earth paint and self-adhesive steel paper from Magnetic Displays, some dead Mexican gunfighters and dead horses from Great Escape Games' Dead Man's Hand range and, perhaps most significantly, this:

As a fan of the Marcus Didius Falco books by Lindsey Davis, I really ought to have tried this earlier. I like the idea of translating the characters in the books into the games terms and sourcing suitable 28mm figures. In particular I'd love to find suitable figures for Lenia the laundress and Smaractus, Aventine gangster and Falco's landlord.

At first glance the rules look interesting. They are very clearly based on the assumption that the players will each be running a street gang trying to gain control of an area either for their own nefarious purposes or to promote the interests of some high-ranking citizen with designs on a senate seat.

Gangs of maybe three or four figures are controlled by the two players but there will also be a number of "mob bases" in the playing area. These represent the uninvolved population of the city and they move at least partly under the control of one player or another but only for short periods of time and on a random basis.

An interesting idea is that in some circumstances characters can disappear into the Mob, their figure being removed from the table only to reappear where least expected.

Another interesting aspect of the game is the activation system. This is initially driven by drawing counters from a bag. When one of your counters comes up, you choose a figure to activate and place one to four counters (marked I, II, III and IV) on the board stating what the character will attempt to do.

So you might say, I'm going to move to here (placing the "I" counter at the location your gang member will move to), climb down to ground level to here (placing counter "II"), move again to here (counter "III") and then blend into the this Mob (counter "IV").

The player then rolls a number of six-sided dice equal to the character's Agility stat (this seems typically to be in the range 5 to 7). Each success (4+) sees one of the selected actions completed, obviously taking them in chronological order. Any action that isn't made puts stress on the gang member and has them rolling fewer dice next time. You can only remove this stress by achieving everything you attempt to do (you must attempt a minimum of one action) so a stressed character will probably take it easy when next activated.

The game is clearly designed with a view to urban adventures in the Eternal City but I could see myself adapting it to cover the encounters of a certain Imperial agent and his allies in the countryside around the Bay of Naples or perhaps even in the wilds of Germania Libera.

Finally, as always, I'm giving some thought to whether these rules might have a Gloranthan application. Gangs of Pavis? Gangs of Glamour?